<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Employment Agency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2005/09/08/employment-agency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2005/09/08/employment-agency/</link>
	<description>A blog for odd things and odd thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:21:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OddThinking &#187; An Almost Modern Linguistic Phenomenon</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2005/09/08/employment-agency/comment-page-1/#comment-73703</link>
		<dc:creator>OddThinking &#187; An Almost Modern Linguistic Phenomenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=80#comment-73703</guid>
		<description>[...] noticed a modern linguistic phenomenon where people linked to several words in a row in their post. Each link was to a web-page giving an example of what they were talking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noticed a modern linguistic phenomenon where people linked to several words in a row in their post. Each link was to a web-page giving an example of what they were talking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OddThinking &#187; The World of Upper- &#38; Lower-Case Mappings</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2005/09/08/employment-agency/comment-page-1/#comment-1404</link>
		<dc:creator>OddThinking &#187; The World of Upper- &#38; Lower-Case Mappings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=80#comment-1404</guid>
		<description>&lt;!-- UnMarkedDown_2_01132522743--&gt;&lt;p&gt;[...] I&#8217;m no linguist - nor do I play one on TV, but it can be fun to have a dig around in their world. I&#8217;ve been doing a bit of research. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- UnMarkedDown_2_01132522743-->
<p>[...] I&#8217;m no linguist &#8211; nor do I play one on TV, but it can be fun to have a dig around in their world. I&#8217;ve been doing a bit of research. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2005/09/08/employment-agency/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=80#comment-675</guid>
		<description>&lt;!-- UnMarkedDown_2_01132522646--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a bit of a head-start for the people playing at home. The (US) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;National Science Foundation&lt;/a&gt; has a publication called the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind02/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Science and Engineering Indicators 2002&lt;/a&gt;. While it is quite dated, it contains an relevant figure:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind02/c7/fig07-13.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/images/EmploymentAgency/occupations.gif&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- UnMarkedDown_2_01132522646-->
<p>Here&#8217;s a bit of a head-start for the people playing at home. The (US) <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">National Science Foundation</a> has a publication called the <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind02/" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">Science and Engineering Indicators 2002</a>. While it is quite dated, it contains an relevant figure:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind02/c7/fig07-13.htm" rel="nofollow" class="liimagelink"><img src="http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/images/EmploymentAgency/occupations.gif"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2005/09/08/employment-agency/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 06:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=80#comment-659</guid>
		<description>&lt;!-- UnMarkedDown_2_01132522642--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alastair,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;sorry&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So you should be!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Umm, how about builders? There’s lots of them and you hardly ever see them on TV (except for Xander in Buffy).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bob the Builder. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/pet/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Auf Wiedersehen, Pet&lt;/a&gt;. Bit roles in adverts. I agree, they may well be under-represented because of the sheer numbers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Sales Reps?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cadillac Men. Lots of adverts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Shopkeepers?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/guide/articles/o/openallhours_66600470.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Open All Hours&lt;/a&gt;. Clerks. Does Mr Hooper in Sesame Street still count?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Unemployed?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your strategy is a good one. Go for the occupations (I&#039;ll count &quot;unemployed&quot; here) that are &lt;em&gt;so&lt;/em&gt; popular in real-life that they are under-represented on TV. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, If someone can come up with an occupation that rarer than &quot;unemployed&quot; (but still popular enough known for people to accept it as a valid occupation) and that occupation &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; appears on TV, who should get the prize?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One suggestion I received: actuaries. Ever seen one on TV?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- UnMarkedDown_2_01132522642-->
<p>Alastair,</p>
<blockquote><p>sorry</p></blockquote>
<p>So you should be!</p>
<blockquote><p>Umm, how about builders? There’s lots of them and you hardly ever see them on TV (except for Xander in Buffy).</p></blockquote>
<p>Bob the Builder. <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/pet/" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">Auf Wiedersehen, Pet</a>. Bit roles in adverts. I agree, they may well be under-represented because of the sheer numbers.</p>
<blockquote><p>Sales Reps?</p></blockquote>
<p>Cadillac Men. Lots of adverts.</p>
<blockquote><p>Shopkeepers?</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/guide/articles/o/openallhours_66600470.shtml" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">Open All Hours</a>. Clerks. Does Mr Hooper in Sesame Street still count?</p>
<blockquote><p>The Unemployed?</p></blockquote>
<p>Your strategy is a good one. Go for the occupations (I&#8217;ll count &#8220;unemployed&#8221; here) that are <em>so</em> popular in real-life that they are under-represented on TV. </p>
<p>However, If someone can come up with an occupation that rarer than &#8220;unemployed&#8221; (but still popular enough known for people to accept it as a valid occupation) and that occupation <em>never</em> appears on TV, who should get the prize?</p>
<p>One suggestion I received: actuaries. Ever seen one on TV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2005/09/08/employment-agency/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 04:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=80#comment-658</guid>
		<description>&lt;!-- UnMarkedDown_2_01132522639--&gt;&lt;p&gt;A TV show about linguists? How cunning! (sorry)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Umm, how about builders? There&#039;s lots of them and you hardly ever see them on TV (except for Xander in Buffy).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sales Reps? Shopkeepers? The Unemployed?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- UnMarkedDown_2_01132522639-->
<p>A TV show about linguists? How cunning! (sorry)</p>
<p>Umm, how about builders? There&#8217;s lots of them and you hardly ever see them on TV (except for Xander in Buffy).</p>
<p>Sales Reps? Shopkeepers? The Unemployed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

