<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for OddThinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking</link>
	<description>A blog for odd things and odd thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Bloglines Feedback by onlinemovieez</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2006/06/29/bloglines-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-225007</link>
		<dc:creator>onlinemovieez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2006/06/29/bloglines-feedback/#comment-225007</guid>
		<description>You Can Watch Online New Romantic, Comedy, Horror, Sexual And Moral Hollywood Full Movies 100% Updated and totally Free Available Only At: http://onlinemovieez.info/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Can Watch Online New Romantic, Comedy, Horror, Sexual And Moral Hollywood Full Movies 100% Updated and totally Free Available Only At: <a href="http://onlinemovieez.info/" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">http://onlinemovieez.info/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On The Marriage Act (1961) by Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2009/12/05/on-the-marriage-act-1961/comment-page-1/#comment-224744</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=1087#comment-224744</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://tailsteak.com/archive.php?num=495&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I am not alone!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tailsteak.com/archive.php?num=495" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">I am not alone!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chess Software Blues by Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2005/08/02/chess-software-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-224608</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=64#comment-224608</guid>
		<description>Is there a statute of limitations on blog errors?

I meant King&#039;s pawn, 6 spaces. I didn&#039;t think it through enough 5 years ago. You would think that I would recall the incident more clearly when I wrote this post. Back then, the incident was probably only about 20 years earlier. Now it is closer to 25.

As for the C64/Herc card combo, I think ownership of a Hercules card (and able to recall that) puts us in a pretty rare group already.

In fact, even &lt;a href=&quot;http://clientsfromhell.tumblr.com/post/374346708/thrown-under-the-bus&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;remembering monochrome screens at all&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a statute of limitations on blog errors?</p>
<p>I meant King&#8217;s pawn, 6 spaces. I didn&#8217;t think it through enough 5 years ago. You would think that I would recall the incident more clearly when I wrote this post. Back then, the incident was probably only about 20 years earlier. Now it is closer to 25.</p>
<p>As for the C64/Herc card combo, I think ownership of a Hercules card (and able to recall that) puts us in a pretty rare group already.</p>
<p>In fact, even <a href="http://clientsfromhell.tumblr.com/post/374346708/thrown-under-the-bus" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">remembering monochrome screens at all</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chess Software Blues by John Y.</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2005/08/02/chess-software-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-224607</link>
		<dc:creator>John Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=64#comment-224607</guid>
		<description>I wonder if I am setting some kind of record for what &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stack Overflow&lt;/a&gt; calls necromancy.  (Though I must admit, I&#039;m aided by my comment feed and StartTags.com.)

My actual comment regards this:
&lt;blockquote&gt;My opening move was to move my Queen’s pawn forward &lt;em&gt;seven&lt;/em&gt; spaces – taking the black King.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
This is surprising in quite a few ways, giving rise to the following possibilities:

1.  Perhaps you said seven because &quot;the pawn starts one row up from the bottom, and the opponent&#039;s king is on the eighth row&quot; but really meant six (classic off-by-one error, perhaps due to too much Python on the brain).

2.  The kings face each other at the start, on the same column, so perhaps you meant you moved your king&#039;s pawn.

3.  You moved your queen&#039;s pawn, but perhaps you felt it not worth mentioning the one-square lateral portion of the move because pawns normally capture from the adjacent column anyway.

4.  The game&#039;s interface was such that you specified moves in terms of displacement, rather than destination, and thus you issued the command to really move your queen&#039;s pawn seven squares forward (only) and through array bound overflow or other logic error, it calculated the pawn&#039;s new position as the starting position of the black king, thus capturing it.

5.  The game actually provided an incorrect starting layout, such that the black king faced the white queen.

6.  Not a possibility, but rather a musing, since you didn&#039;t mention whether your pawn got promoted:  I wonder if the game was designed to handle promotions.  This spawns further musings (which I&#039;ll not bother numbering), such as whether it always promoted to queen, or provided some kind of interface to choose your promotion.  And if you chose your own promotion, whether you could choose pawn, or perhaps even a piece of the other color, etc.

But even without the conundrum of Julian&#039;s Gambit (Ignored), this post brings back memories.  Also, you are the only person I am aware of who had both a Commodore 64 as well as a PC with a Hercules Graphics Card.  (I had various 8-bit Atari computers, as well as a Hercules-equipped PC, but never a C64.  And I never witnessed monochrome Battle Chess, as I played the native Amiga version.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if I am setting some kind of record for what <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">Stack Overflow</a> calls necromancy.  (Though I must admit, I&#8217;m aided by my comment feed and StartTags.com.)</p>
<p>My actual comment regards this:</p>
<blockquote><p>My opening move was to move my Queen’s pawn forward <em>seven</em> spaces – taking the black King.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is surprising in quite a few ways, giving rise to the following possibilities:</p>
<p>1.  Perhaps you said seven because &#8220;the pawn starts one row up from the bottom, and the opponent&#8217;s king is on the eighth row&#8221; but really meant six (classic off-by-one error, perhaps due to too much Python on the brain).</p>
<p>2.  The kings face each other at the start, on the same column, so perhaps you meant you moved your king&#8217;s pawn.</p>
<p>3.  You moved your queen&#8217;s pawn, but perhaps you felt it not worth mentioning the one-square lateral portion of the move because pawns normally capture from the adjacent column anyway.</p>
<p>4.  The game&#8217;s interface was such that you specified moves in terms of displacement, rather than destination, and thus you issued the command to really move your queen&#8217;s pawn seven squares forward (only) and through array bound overflow or other logic error, it calculated the pawn&#8217;s new position as the starting position of the black king, thus capturing it.</p>
<p>5.  The game actually provided an incorrect starting layout, such that the black king faced the white queen.</p>
<p>6.  Not a possibility, but rather a musing, since you didn&#8217;t mention whether your pawn got promoted:  I wonder if the game was designed to handle promotions.  This spawns further musings (which I&#8217;ll not bother numbering), such as whether it always promoted to queen, or provided some kind of interface to choose your promotion.  And if you chose your own promotion, whether you could choose pawn, or perhaps even a piece of the other color, etc.</p>
<p>But even without the conundrum of Julian&#8217;s Gambit (Ignored), this post brings back memories.  Also, you are the only person I am aware of who had both a Commodore 64 as well as a PC with a Hercules Graphics Card.  (I had various 8-bit Atari computers, as well as a Hercules-equipped PC, but never a C64.  And I never witnessed monochrome Battle Chess, as I played the native Amiga version.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comparing Strings: An Analysis of Diff Algorithms by Maarten</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2006/01/16/comparing-strings-an-analysis-of-diff-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-223014</link>
		<dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2006/01/16/comparing-strings-an-analysis-of-diff-algorithms/#comment-223014</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Myers86&quot; reference is most likely &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.scientificcommons.org/42915130&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;An O(ND) Difference Algorithm and Its Variations&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, published in 1986 by Eugene W. Myers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Myers86&#8243; reference is most likely &#8220;<a href="http://en.scientificcommons.org/42915130" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">An O(ND) Difference Algorithm and Its Variations</a>&#8220;, published in 1986 by Eugene W. Myers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New spam getting through by Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2010/02/23/new-spam-getting-through/comment-page-1/#comment-223007</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=1159#comment-223007</guid>
		<description>In an ironic twist, Aristotle&#039;s comment was posted exactly as the server  (MySQL DB?) had some downtime - apparently, the hosting providers admins were doing some work on it.

It got caught in a limbo state between being posted and being rejected as spam, and wouldn&#039;t appear until I manually pushed it through the spam filters again.

I am trying to reassure myself it was a coincidence, and not just part of a spammer&#039;s vengeful Denial Of Service attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an ironic twist, Aristotle&#8217;s comment was posted exactly as the server  (MySQL DB?) had some downtime &#8211; apparently, the hosting providers admins were doing some work on it.</p>
<p>It got caught in a limbo state between being posted and being rejected as spam, and wouldn&#8217;t appear until I manually pushed it through the spam filters again.</p>
<p>I am trying to reassure myself it was a coincidence, and not just part of a spammer&#8217;s vengeful Denial Of Service attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New spam getting through by Aristotle Pagaltzis</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2010/02/23/new-spam-getting-through/comment-page-1/#comment-223005</link>
		<dc:creator>Aristotle Pagaltzis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=1159#comment-223005</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of spam mail that contains no attachments and no links and just a lot of nonsense text. People theorised that they may be attempts to de-train Bayes filters. Maybe something similar is going on here with someone trying to bamboozle some popular spam comment filter in order to puncture it with real spam later.

But who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of spam mail that contains no attachments and no links and just a lot of nonsense text. People theorised that they may be attempts to de-train Bayes filters. Maybe something similar is going on here with someone trying to bamboozle some popular spam comment filter in order to puncture it with real spam later.</p>
<p>But who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Hat Trick of Trick Questions by Yahoouj</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2007/02/27/a-hat-trick-of-trick-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-223000</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoouj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2007/02/27/a-hat-trick-of-trick-questions/#comment-223000</guid>
		<description>Really good work about this website was done. Keep trying more - thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good work about this website was done. Keep trying more &#8211; thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New spam getting through by Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2010/02/23/new-spam-getting-through/comment-page-1/#comment-222996</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=1159#comment-222996</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dave, I will try that.

(Hey! You are not supposed to be supporting SpamKarma any more. I hope the real-life karma of doing so helps with your re-incarnation.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dave, I will try that.</p>
<p>(Hey! You are not supposed to be supporting SpamKarma any more. I hope the real-life karma of doing so helps with your re-incarnation.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New spam getting through by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/2010/02/23/new-spam-getting-through/comment-page-1/#comment-222995</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somethinkodd.com/oddthinking/?p=1159#comment-222995</guid>
		<description>Indeed, that&#039;s baffling (but then again, if I had a karma point for every batshit-stupid useless spammer trick out there, my next incarnation would probably be as Penelope Cruz&#039; front-opening bra strap)... 

An easy workaround is to add your own URL to the gray list. For that matter, you could probably even blacklist it (your own comments will still go through no matter what).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, that&#8217;s baffling (but then again, if I had a karma point for every batshit-stupid useless spammer trick out there, my next incarnation would probably be as Penelope Cruz&#8217; front-opening bra strap)&#8230; </p>
<p>An easy workaround is to add your own URL to the gray list. For that matter, you could probably even blacklist it (your own comments will still go through no matter what).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
