OddThinking

A blog for odd things and odd thoughts.

Online Photo DB: Stage 4j – Evaluation of Photobucket

Which requirements does Photobucket meet?

Id Pri Requirement Pass? Notes
GEN1 C Accessible by a typical web-browser Y
GEN2 I Active development of new features Y
OWN1 C Ownership of photos is retained by me. N Keep a copy
OWN2 C Future-proofed against money running out: mine or yours N
OWN3 I Ownership of meta-data is retained by me. N Keep a copy
CAT1 C Photographs grouped into albums by event Y
CAT2 C Photographs tagged with people Y
CAT3 I Photographs tagged with locations, objects, activities Y
CAT4 I Performers tagged with real and stage names. Y
CAT5 I Attribution of photographer details N?
CAT6 I Attribution of copyright owner’s details N?
CAT7 I Rating of photographs N
CAT8 I Sorting/Filtering by rating N
CAT9 D Albums grouped by type N
CAT10 D Albums grouped by date N
CAT11 D Areas or points of photograph tagged Y
CAT12 D Simple contact management of subjects Y
CAT13 D Hidden fields on contacts to distinguish like-named people N
CAT14 D Tagging of anonymous people to enable searching N
CAT15 D Corrections to names update everywhere N
CAT16 D Attribution of copyright details N
CAT17 D Control over (default) ordering Y
S+L1 C Link to other photos with same tag within an album Y
S+L2 I Associate URLs with subjects, that are displayed. Y
S+L3 I Link to other photos with same tag across my albums Y
S+L4 I Search of tags by keyword Y
S+L5 I Cross-promotion of other albums and sites. N
S+L6 D Link to other photos with same tag across other photo sites N
S+L7 D Search of album names by keyword Y
S+L8 D User-generatable URLs to search tags by keyword N
COMM1 D Multi-user Tagging N
COMM2 D Notifications of appearance in photos Y
COMM3 D Comments permitted Y
COMM4 D Notification of comments Y
COMM5 D RSS or Atom Feeds for comments ?
COMM6 D RSS or Atom Feeds for subjects ?
COMM7 D RSS or Atom Feeds for new photos Y
PQ1 C Web-quality images shall be displayed by default. Y
PQ2 I Print-quality images shall be available. Y
PQ3 I Automatically generated thumbnail and web-quality versions. Y
PQ4 D Archive-quality images shall be stored. N 5 MB limit
PQ5 D Custom thumbnails (e.g. choosing to crop over shrinking.) N?
PQ6 D Support for short video Y
PQ7 D Support for long video N
PERF1 I Quota > 0.5 TB, if any N 10 GB
PERF2 I Low-cost N $US40 p.a.
PERF3 I Fast response time N
PERF4 I Scale to thousands of tags
PERF5 I < 1 minute face-time per photograph N
PERF6 D Free N
UI1 C Forward/Backward navigation between photos in album. Y
UI2 D Slideshows Y Limited to 100 photos
UI3 D Display of many thumbnails at once Y
PRIV1 C Their email address should never be published on the web. Y
PRIV2 I Registration and logging in not required for general use. Y
PRIV3 I Robust privacy features for photographs ?
WF1 I Hint to original location on my harddrive N
WF2 I Auto-complete or partial search on tags during input ?
WF3 D Read EXIF data from image N
WF4 D Support unpublished draft state ?
MIGR1 C API to add photos Y
MIGR2 C API to add tags Y
MIGR3 I Tags can be non-specific to areas of photo Y
METR1 D “How many visitors?” metric N
METR2 D “How long does a visitor stay?” metric N

Summary

Apparently, this is a popular photo site. They give free accounts (with advertising, 1 GB limit) or Pro accounts for $40 p.a (10 GB limit).

Maybe I am being unfair because it is late…

Maybe I am being unfair because I am evaluating the advertising-funded trial version, rather than the final result…

… but my eyes were watering looking at the site. It was cluttered and filled with flashing adverts and other attention-grabbing items. I think Photobucket probably works well as a host for your individual images, but not as a host for your albums.

Bonus points, however, for being the only site so far that let you tag a picture with a user id from another site, or with a straight URL.